HIGH-LEVERAGE PRACTICES IN Self-contained EBD and Alternative Education CLASSROOMS

Learning How to Learn: Giving Students the Strategies to Learn Independently

Episode Description

This episode explores teaching cognitive and metacognitive strategies to support learning and independence. Heather and Jon unpack what it means to help students—and adults—notice and reflect on their thoughts, connecting those thoughts to behaviors and emotions. Jon shares practical examples from his work with students, showing how guiding them to ask, “What am I telling myself about this?” can break cycles of conflict and anxiety while building self-awareness.

The conversation highlights both the challenges and the transformative potential of teaching metacognition, emphasizing that it’s not about stopping thoughts or forcing positivity, but about recognizing and reframing unhelpful thinking. They also discuss how educators can model this process themselves, shifting from rigid expectations to empathetic understanding. Listeners come away with insight into how fostering metacognition empowers students to develop resilience, internal control, and healthier ways of engaging with the world.

Key Points and Takeaways

  • Cognitive and metacognitive strategies involve understanding and regulating one's own thinking, which is essential for effective learning.
  • Educators play a pivotal role in teaching these strategies through explicit modeling and guided practice.
  • Students with learning differences benefit significantly from structured cognitive strategies, requiring direct instruction and feedback.
  • The balance of cognitive strategies and metacognitive development fosters students' independence in learning.
  • Effective use of these strategies is essential across various educational content and student needs, enhancing overall learning experiences.
Podcast Guest

Jonathon Barberio, MA, LPCA

Jon Barberio works with clients to explore their stories and the narratives others have written for them that they no longer wish to own while helping change unhealthy and untrue thoughts and beliefs that lead to negative experiences. He loves teaching families to be curious about the systems they are a part of and how they each affect each other because no one person is “the problem.” Outside of his professional work, he loves reading fiction, playing any competitive sport, playing board games, having thought-provoking conversations by a fire, and would own way too many project cars if he could. Jonathon is a Licensed Professional Counselor Associate with his Bachelors in Psychology and Theology, Masters in Clinical Counseling, and has certifications in rational emotive behavioral therapy, cognitive process therapy, and behavioral therapy for those struggling with challenging experiences.
Looking for CEUs? Click "01 | Listen" below!

Project Onward

Build a transformative intensive program with your complex at-risk students.
Join the next cohort to develop your self-contained EBD or alternative education program from design through implementation!
High-Leverage Practice #14:
Teach cognitive and metacognitive strategies to support learning and independence.
Teachers explicitly teach cognitive and metacognitive processing strategies to support memory, attention, and self-regulation of learning. Learning involves not only understanding content but also using cognitive processes to solve problems, regulate attention, organize thoughts and materials, and monitor one’s own thinking. Self-regulation and metacognitive strategy instruction is integrated into lessons on academic content through modeling and explicit instruction. Students learn to monitor and evaluate their performance in relation to explicit goals and make necessary adjustments to improve learning.
Empty space, drag to resize
I actually can choose how I interact in this world, and I can actually change how I view things.

Jon Barberio

Empty space, drag to resize


Host: Heather Volchko

Guest: Jon Barberio

This week, we're talking about High-Leverage Practice number 14: teaching cognitive and metacognitive strategies to support learning and independence. And I'm super excited for Jon to be with us because he does this with his students on the regular. So, Jon, for you and your practice, what does this look like?

I think to boil it down and then maybe expand on it, it's just thinking about what you're thinking about. Bringing to focus the thoughts that are leading you to act in ways that, in a school setting, would not be helpful. And just kind of getting kids and even adults in my practice just to start being aware of the things that are happening, causing our emotions, because we don't usually think about that; we usually say, ‘Hey, this happened. And I felt this way about it.’

And the example that I always give people is, I'm afraid of spiders. Some people aren't. And it's not because spiders are inherently terrifying, although I would argue they are. But it's about a preconceived notion that I have about him.

Let's break it down. Are you talking cognition? Are you talking about metacognition? And how are we teaching this? It seems like a really complex internal process. Like, what does it look like to actually walk someone through developing those skills?

Yeah, well, I always like having examples. So in the school, students are fighting. I would have one of those referrals every single week. And one of the first questions I'd have is asking both sides of the story what happened. And let's just say one student called another one a name. And so if I were to ask what happened, they would say, ‘Well, she said. She called me this name, and that's why the fight happened.’

And my goal for that instance is to bring to the focus, for this student, well, no, you told yourself something about that. You told yourself, people can't speak to me that way, or I get- I have to defend myself. Or thoughts like that. And so my goal with students, and even working with the teachers as well, is to help them understand. Well, what were you telling yourself about what she said? And trying to break that link between words and violence.

And that would be like the metacognitive way of thinking about it, which adults don't do. And even less so kids, sometimes it's not something we are often taught to think about our thoughts.

Yeah, I mean, that's something that our team runs into all the time, as especially classroom professionals, we're trained in curriculum and instruction and learning habits. And if we're aware of that metacognitive aspect of learning, it's typically an application to academics or the content that we are supporting them to learn. We do tend to hit a bit of a roadblock when we're working with classroom professionals, because sometimes they're not even aware. They've just kind of like come into it, and they just sort of intuitively know or think these ways. And sometimes it's been kind of fun for our team to engage with some of our classroom professionals who are just naturally gifted at walking themselves and walking their students through these things. But they don't- like the way you are explaining it, it's not an active process for them. It's just how they see the world and how they're going to choose to engage with their students and to support their students to engage with their peers or other people in positions of authority, or whatever that looks like.

So I'm really curious for you, like, are there any of those strategies that either adults can be leveraging to break down how we're actually processing through or thinking these things to almost notice that within ourselves? Before we turn around and try to help our students through it?

Yeah. One of the first things that stuck out. Well, two things really. And this goes back to roadmaps about how we view the world. Kids are developing a roadmap. And it's really hard for kids to erase something and replace it with new information. And for adults, it's the same. It's the same way. But when it comes to teachers, one of the things that, and this just comes from my background in CBT, is to look for the ‘shoulds.’ ‘Well, this kid should be obedient.’ Well, especially when we're dealing with kids of, you know, adverse experiences at a young age. Well, no, their bodies actually should be high-level, on alert all the time. They should not be able to sit still.

And I think even just noticing that framework for a teacher, like, okay, this child is actually doing what they've been taught to do. It starts with empathy for the child. And I think if you can just teach that in a classroom, which I don't know how teachers can do that for 20 plus kids for hours on end. But yeah, it starts with noticing our cognitions. And when I first started teaching this, it was a good and bad effect because then I couldn't avoid my own irrational ways of thinking. Even with my clients. I've been seeing them for 16 sessions. They should be getting this by now. And just in saying that, I have a demand and it's not real, and I'm fighting against irrational thought rather than saying, ‘okay, this is who they are. I'm going to show up if they show up.’ I feel like I didn't explain that perfectly.

No, that's okay. I mean, I think if nothing else, like, people who are listening to this can hear. It is complex and messy to process it ourselves, let alone to then turn around and try to help someone else through it. But I think in education, it's somewhat of a given, like, it's expected that all adults know all things and can then walk all students through those same things, content or otherwise.

I mean, especially in that kind of social, emotional, behavioral space. How we even learned that and how that's showing up for us is completely different person to person across an entire staff, let alone then each kid in each of those classes is also having a very different experience.

So I think, like, it's okay for this to be a little bit messy because it just frankly is. And it is a very individual experience that we're sort of engaging in a conversation around it being a collective experience.

Yeah, I like going to the collective experience and bringing up the roadmaps again, when we understand that everybody has a perspective, and for them, it's just the way that they've learned to make sense of the world. And a lot of what my job is as a therapist is kind of like, ‘well, let's retrace where we got some of these ideas, and let's see, are they actually helpful for your end goals?’ 

But I teach this, this is the same thing for couples counseling or even workplace disputes, I always start with, okay, we all have an understanding. Understand that yours is not objectively true. And even if it is, and you try to put that on somebody else, well, it's not going to work out. And so to teach that in a classroom, going back to the fighting, one of them had a roadmap that said, ‘if/then.’ If I'm talked to, then I fight.

And allowing the children to understand that is not something that's concrete. That's not something that you have to hold on to. But especially, I think it starts, like you said, with helping teachers just become aware. And the best question is, what did you tell yourself about that? Whenever a student says, ‘I'm having a hard time with this test.’ Okay, but what are you telling yourself about that?

And if they're saying, ‘well, I'm going to fail,’ you're going to have a hard time. And just even getting to students, that's one of my favorite things to do, students are afraid of, what is it called? Test anxiety. ‘What are you telling yourself about that?’ And then realizing, ‘well, I'm no good, it's too hard, I can't make it.’ Once we can change that. I love seeing their grades slowly climb.

Well, I know we've been talking about what it is. I want to shift this conversation a little bit toward what it is not. Because I know sometimes, especially in education, I'll run into either practices or there are portions of even, like, curriculum materials that are like, here's a strategy that you can use. And not all of them necessarily are doing what you're talking about. So, can you give me some examples that someone might think is either a cognitive or a metacognitive strategy, but you're like, that's not really hitting the mark.

Yeah, I'm really glad you brought that up, because I miss that sometimes. And I hear people saying, ‘Okay, so I just have to change the way I think.’ And, yes, but if it were that easy, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Right?

Right.

Yeah. So what it's not is just trying to say, ‘well, don't worry about it,’ or, ‘don't think that way,’ or, ‘hey, that's not true. So get that out of your head.’ The example that I always use is ‘Don't think about a purple elephant.’ I try really hard not to think about a purple elephant. And now that elephant starts to. It gets more detailed, right? And so what it's not is just not having thoughts or trying to stop your thoughts.

It really is just taking a moment to consider, what am I actually saying about this? And accepting that. I'm saying, ‘okay, I think I'm gonna fail this test.’ Where is that going to get me? And then learning what is something true we could say? So you can't just stop thinking about the purple elephant. You have to have it, I don't know, walk away, and then a red bird shows up. And so it's not just stopping our thoughts. It's not just not feeling what we're feeling. But it's understanding that thoughts are not objectively true, and feelings are not facts. And if you start with that, then we say, okay, well, what is true and what feelings are, I don't want to say valid, because all feelings are really valid. Helpful, I guess, would be a better term.

I like how you're talking about this because a lot of times in schools, especially when we're working with students with high rates of maladaptive behaviors, or they don't have some of those pro-social skills on a more fluent level, or they have them with some people, not with other people. We typically find a staff member who is very directive and has put in really good boundaries of these are the expectations, and this is what we do, and this is what we don't do.

And they're very focused on supporting the student to meet those expectations, whatever that may be. It could be academically, it could be social, it could be all kinds of different things, but they're very focused on meeting those expectations, and they're great at providing somewhat constructive feedback on whether they're meeting it, how they're meeting it. But I really appreciate how you're saying, no, you need to take another layer below, just ‘are you or aren't you?’ It's not just stop doing that, stop thinking about that, do this instead.

But it's really more like, ‘okay, pause. How did we get here? Let's walk through some of the thinking around how we got here. Cool. Now, can we be more aware of that next time?’ And I know in my world, in secondary, especially in alternative ed, I was doing that all the time in my classroom, and I did not have fancy words for it at the time, but I knew it worked because they had a brain and they were using it. And so if I could help them engage it in a different way, then that's better for all of us.

But we also work with elementary and preschool, and a lot of those staff will be like, ‘That's too complicated. Like, they're not ready for that yet.’ But really, they are. And sometimes some of our youngest students are the most, multiple, pliable, like they are already thinking, they're already making sense of the world in some of these ways, and they step up in ways that have completely blown the minds of our staff.

Yeah, I love the malleability of the younger kids. And obviously, this isn't to manipulate them, but they're building those roadmaps, they're building those life maps, and when you can start asking those questions at an early age before it gets solidified. ‘So, so and so said something to you that must have hurt your feelings. What were you saying about that?’ ‘Well, she shouldn't do that.’ ‘There are going to be people who hurt you in the world. How do you want?’ And just kind of starting that conversation to at least, if nothing else, just bring awareness to little ones that you can choose how we go about things in this world. 

And again, it's not about just ‘stop thinking bad’ or thinking happy thoughts or just not worrying about what she said. It's about calling attention to the underlying thing, the real reasons why we're doing and acting. And you said it like kids aren't going to be able to articulate that. But if we can even just start that process of, ‘oh, okay, I actually can choose how I interact in this world, and I can actually change how I view things.’

When we're in education, we'll usually use words like internal locus of control. External locus of control. Am I in charge of my world, or is my world in charge of me? And I really love how, the way you're talking about metacognitive strategies is really forcing that internal locus. Like, I can actually see how I'm thinking about what I'm thinking, and I can choose if I want to keep that or if I want to change that.

And that, that entire process gives so much power to the individual to be able to realize, ‘oh, even though my world may be going sideways everywhere and everything is horrible and awful and I don't see how my choices are actually impacting what's happening to me or what's going on around me. That's at least something that I can do.’ And that, that is like so hope-filled. That is an amazing thing.

Yeah. And we may not even have time for this. But one thing that I encourage parents and teachers to think about is, a child, when they're born, they're entirely wrapped up with their caregivers. They have no sense of space. There is no locus of control. And then as they grow, they slowly learn what their space is. But that's not something that's going to happen naturally. They're going to assume that everything needs to cater to them, and just knowing that that's where they're coming from, and just teaching them gently. And it's not about you don't have control. It's about actually, you have a lot of control over this little thing called you, and the more you learn to control that, the less anxiety you have.

Well, thank you so much for engaging in this conversation with me. I think you bring a really needed perspective into some of these somewhat intimate but also just sort of like personal or sometimes like complex or touchy conversations that just naturally pop up in that educator-student dynamic. So thank you for bringing your expertise to this conversation.

Absolutely. Thank you, Heather.

Empty space, drag to resize
The best question is, what did you tell yourself about that?

Jon Barberio

Empty space, drag to resize

Students with learning differences often don’t naturally employ learning strategies to boost their academic performance the way their typically developing peers do, which is why these strategies need to be explicitly taught. A key point to understand is that learning strategies aren't just step-by-step instructions. Instead, they serve as tools, or heuristics, that guide students in using higher-order thinking or applying complex skills. As Rosenshine and Meister described, these strategies facilitate learning rather than dictate every move.


When students use strategies, they’re engaging in a dual-layer process of problem-solving. First, they apply a cognitive strategy to a task, such as predicting outcomes, summarizing information, or making sense of context. On a higher level, metacognitive strategies kick in—they help students monitor their own performance, self-regulate, and make decisions about the effectiveness of the approach they’re using. The goal is to turn students into proficient problem-solvers, enabling them to self-monitor, identify problem areas, create solutions, and assess their own success. In essence, teaching students these cognitive strategies is about teaching them how to learn.


These strategies are highly versatile and can be applied across various subjects and skill areas. Whether it's using strategic reading techniques, employing models for writing like the self-regulated strategy development (SRSD), or solving math problems with schema-based instruction, the core idea remains the same. Even strategies focused on memory retention, such as mnemonic devices, or self-management techniques like self-monitoring, serve to empower students to take control of their learning.


The most effective way to teach these strategies is through explicit instruction. This involves highly structured lessons where teachers model the use of the strategy, guiding students through practice, monitoring their progress, and providing feedback. During the modeling phase, teachers don’t just demonstrate the task; they think aloud, showing students how skilled problem solvers approach and process tasks. This think-aloud technique also strengthens students’ metacognitive abilities by teaching them to reflect on their own thought processes as they work through challenges. This combination of strategy use and metacognitive development is what ultimately helps students become more independent and effective learners.


Cognitive and metacognitive strategies are powerful tools designed to help students become more self-directed and independent in their learning. While some students might naturally figure out strategies on their own, students with learning differences often need direct, explicit instruction to learn these strategies. This is where teachers play a critical role—by teaching not only the strategies themselves but also when and how to apply them. When teachers explicitly teach these strategies through modeling and guided practice, it's been shown to be highly effective for students with learning differences across various content areas.


It's essential that teachers carefully select the strategies they introduce. This isn't just about picking any strategy; it’s about using data and working collaboratively with colleagues to choose the approaches that will be most impactful for each student. The goal is to ensure that students are set up for success and that these strategies become a natural part of their learning process.


One of the key components of this instruction is feedback. Teachers need to provide students with regular feedback on how they’re using these strategies, reinforcing their application over time and across different learning settings. This helps to cement the use of strategies, ensuring that students continue to benefit from them in the long term. In short, teaching strategies effectively isn't just about the initial lesson—it's about guiding students to internalize and apply these tools, giving them the skills they need to thrive in their education independently.


Teachers who effectively teach cognitive and metacognitive strategies play a crucial role in helping students become self-directed and independent learners. They are particularly adept at recognizing learning or behavioral difficulties and use cognitive strategy instruction as a tool to empower students. One of the key things these teachers do is draw from data-informed practices that are already proven to address specific student needs. Instead of reinventing the wheel, they use strategies that have been shown to work, adjusting them to fit the individual learner.


Task analysis is another vital aspect of their approach. By breaking down goals into smaller, achievable steps, these educators create a clear path for students to follow. They then teach this process explicitly, ensuring that students understand not just what to do, but how to get there. For tasks that require self-regulation—things like setting goals, self-monitoring, and using positive reinforcement—teachers provide direct instruction, guiding students in developing these essential skills.


Strategic instruction models, such as the Self-Regulated Strategy Development or the Strategic Instruction Model, are frequently used by these teachers to boost student memory and information recall. Through these models, they deliver highly structured lessons that break down strategies into manageable chunks. Teachers often demonstrate the steps using think-alouds, a method where they verbalize their own thought process to show how effective problem solvers navigate tasks. This modeling of "inner language" is critical for students to learn how to monitor their own strategy use.


Moreover, teachers ensure students have plenty of practice with the strategy in different contexts and over time. This variety helps students generalize the strategy to new situations, which is key for long-term success. Monitoring student use of strategies is an ongoing process, where teachers check for fidelity and assess whether any modifications the student has made might affect the strategy’s effectiveness. This careful balance of explicit instruction, practice, and feedback helps ensure that students not only learn strategies but also apply them independently and effectively across different learning environments.


For school leaders, supporting teachers in effectively implementing strategies is a critical aspect of fostering student success. One of the key responsibilities is to ensure that educators have access to ongoing professional development, instruction, or coaching in a variety of strategies that can be applied across different educational settings. This equips teachers with a broader toolkit to address the wide range of their students' needs, helping them implement these strategies in ways that enhance learning outcomes.


It's also important for school leaders to actively monitor how teachers are selecting and using these strategies, ensuring that they align with both the students' needs and the grade-level curriculum. Feedback here is vital. By providing targeted guidance, leaders can help teachers refine their approach, making sure the strategies chosen are the best fit for the challenges at hand.


Additionally, staying on top of the latest research is essential. School leaders should not only keep educators informed about new strategies emerging from research but also ensure that the necessary supports are in place to help teachers successfully implement these innovative approaches in their classrooms. This kind of proactive leadership creates a dynamic learning environment where both teachers and students can thrive.


Cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction covers a variety of techniques aimed at transforming students into self-directed and independent learners. The effectiveness of these strategies has been well-documented across numerous studies and different content areas, demonstrating their value for students with various types of learning differences. When these strategies are taught explicitly, using clear modeling and guided practice, they significantly enhance students' ability to manage their own learning processes. This approach not only supports academic growth but also builds essential skills that help students navigate and succeed in their educational journeys.

Empty space, drag to resize