HIGH-LEVERAGE PRACTICES IN Life Skills and Transition Programs

Together, Not Separate:
Why Intensive Instruction Must Combine Behaviors and Academics

Episode Description

In this episode, Heather converses with Marla about High-Leverage Practice number 20, focusing on providing intensive instruction for students who exhibit significant needs beyond the capacity of typical educational settings. In her dynamic role as a behavior consultant, Marla shares insightful narratives and strategies about adapting individual education plans (IEPs) to better service students through Data-Based Individualization (DBI). This episode is a must-listen for educators who are dedicated to refining their approach to intensive student support.

Key Points and Takeaways

  • Data-Based Individualization (DBI) is key to providing tailored, intensive instruction for students who need more than Tier 2 interventions.
  • Collaboration among educational staff, such as behavior consultants and therapists, is crucial in creating effective individualized learning strategies.
  • Understanding students' unique educational profiles, including their IEPs, helps in designing effective learning plans that accommodate their specific needs.
  • Making informed professional judgments gained through quantitative and qualitative data is critical in assessing and adjusting the intensity of support required.
  • Schools must provide consistent professional development for educators to ensure they are equipped to implement adaptive and data-driven teaching methods effectively.
Podcast Guest

Marla Watts-Pacheco, MS, BCBA

Marla Watts-Pacheco is a qualified behavioral health professional and behavior consultant specializing in family engagement, developmental disabilities, autism spectrum disorder, and organizational behavior management. She has been a behavior analyst, behavior specialist, and ABA therapist in clinic, school, and in-home settings. Outside of her professional work, she enjoys time with her family and exploring new places with her husband. Marla is a Board Certified Behavior Analyst with her Bachelors in Behavioral Science and Masters in Applied Behavior Analysis.
Looking for CEUs? Click "01 | Listen" below!

Project Bace

Build an effective, individualized functional skills program for your low-incidence students.
Join the next cohort to develop your instructional environment, responses to behaviors, functional academics, and more!
High-Leverage Practice #20:
Provide Intensive instruction.
Teachers match the intensity of instruction to the intensity of the student’s learning and behavioral challenges. Intensive instruction involves working with students with similar needs on a small number of high-priority, clearly defined skills or concepts critical to academic success. Teachers group students based on common learning needs; clearly define learning goals; and use systematic, explicit, and well-paced instruction. They frequently monitor students’ progress and adjust their instruction accordingly. Within intensive instruction, students have many opportunities to respond and receive immediate, corrective feedback with teachers and peers to practice what they are learning.
Empty space, drag to resize
We really do aim and we should as best practice ethically that we have to really individualize the programming for that student so that way they can get the best support that they need to.

Marla Watts-Pacheco

Empty space, drag to resize


Host: Heather Volchko

Guest: Marla Watts-Pacheco

This week, we're talking about High-Leverage Practice number 20: provide intensive instruction for academics and behavior. And Marla, I'm super excited to have you back for this conversation because this is literally what you do all day, every day, with students who have not been able to be successful in less intensive settings, and so they get to come hang out in your program, and that's where your team provides these things. So, for you, what does this practice look like?

We are a unique setting where basically the students who are not getting those supports in their locals come to us. And that process is a big process in itself of who makes that decision. But ultimately, in our setting, we provide that intense instruction where we're providing those intense supports that those students may not be getting in their local.

And, it looks different for every student, really depending on their disability or what skills they need or what their current skill sets are. So it looks different for everyone. But for us, I think we're a multidisciplinary building. So we don’t just have people like me as a behavior consultant, but we have teacher consultants, we have occupational therapists, we have physical therapists, we have speech therapists, and also visually blind consultants as well. So it's a very big, diverse group. And I think just depending on the students needs and where they're at, that's where we meet as a team and discuss how we're going to do this if that means are we going to provide more intense reinforcement, are we going to provide certain visuals, are we going to have a certain desk that's going to be shaped for them so that way they have access to their peers. Their curriculum as well; how are we modifying the curriculum so that they can learn at their level?

So it's a big mix, Heather. And it's not just like one recipe that we have for every student. It looks different for everyone. But yeah, I think it's really fun. It's really a team effort. And we really just want to ensure that whatever recipe, essentially, that we're going to give, that we're going to come up with, it's going to best fit the student in that moment of whoever we're serving.

Yeah, I love this analogy of a recipe. Because there are so many different ingredients that come and go, and they all have their different role to play. So, for you and your team, how are you figuring out what is even going to need to be considered? I mean, I'm wondering if the sending team is saying, ‘these are our gaps, and this is what we haven't been able to make progress in,’ but then, how does your team figure out, ‘so then here's what we can do. Here's how we can layer in more than their local can.’

You know, and this is even something I myself am still learning, but I feel more confident and have a better understanding of what that looks like now. I think before I had any school experience, I was like, ‘what the what?’ Because for those who are listening that have that in-home experience or have that clinic experience, the closest that I can match to that question that Heather's just asking, what does it look like for locals transferring a student to your setting? How does that work? For us, we can go into a home or a clinic, we assess the client, and we're seeing, ‘okay, what skills are they needing at this time, what barriers are in their way, what skill sets do they have? And then how do we work around that?’

And it's really you as a BCBA trying to figure that out with a parent. If you can also involve your client in that process, even better. And for schools, it's a whole different ballgame. And Heather, I know you have more of that education background, but I think all of it really starts with that IEP, right? When you're going to meet the student, you're going to meet with their teachers, you're going to meet essentially, with the IEP specifically, what we call our academic achievement level. We really look at that, we really think that's the meat and the potatoes of it all. Of like, okay, this is what they're thriving, this is what they're doing, this is what they're exhibiting. And these are some of the issues that we're having right now. Perhaps they were not able to meet this goal. So we look at that and then, as well as taking into account what parents are saying, what teachers are saying, you know, you kind of gather all of that and determine, okay, what goals do we need to continue to work on? What goals are we going to modify? And I think because they are coming to a different setting, like us, our team's going to propose something else too. And sometimes just the change in itself could be a good thing.

I mean, it's a very complex discussion. I wish I could say it's an easy, like, ‘okay, we just do this.’ But I really do think we should, as best practice ethically, that we have to really individualize the programming for that student so that way they can get the best support that they need, that way, they can be successful. So I think we look at the data as well. Like, how were you tracking this school? How is that looking? And then, as always, we may have to modify it, we may have to continue it, or we may have to discontinue it. But I really think it starts there, at an IEP.

Sometimes, if we have the chance to go out into the locals and observe the students as well and see how they're doing there, and ask questions like, ‘Oh, are these the visuals that they need?’ We also look at their sub-aids and services. Like, okay, this is something that they need. The way I view that is not like a nice-to-have. This is what they need in this setting. So, if a student comes with a behavior intervention plan, it's not like, ‘oh, it's nice-to-have, like, they might need this plan.’ No, this student is exhibiting this. We need to have this plan in place. So, not to get very technical with IEPs, but I think that would be the first thing we look at if we do have a student who's going to come over.

Sure. And I think you're also hinting at how you and your team are making those professional judgments to say this individual needs more. And I think the way you're talking about it is, yes, a local has identified that this kid has more needs than what we're able to support at this moment. And so your team can then take that lead and say, ‘Okay, let's figure out what we can do.’

But you're also talking about ramping up different supports or changing out different services or figuring out when that's working, and you're fading back, right? So how does your team show up with, like, quantifiable proof, that like you just said, this is a need. It's not a nice-to-have; it's a need-to-have. So professionally, how does your team stand on, yeah, this level of intensity is needed, and here's how we're going to do it and how we're going to track it and see if it works or not. But, like, how do you back that level of intensity?

Yes. I think, as you're asking this, I really do just hear my other team members just kind of chiming in. Like I said before and even in other podcasts we've had before, like, it really takes a village. And I think, how do we look at that intensity level? And I think a lot of it just goes based on the data. Okay, how was this looking? And then just kind of determining from there that, okay, this is something that they do need to have.

For example, I'm thinking of a student being referred, maybe not so much for medical reasons, but more for their behavior. And perhaps they're coming in with, like, ‘okay, they need to have a plan,’ or it's saying that they have an intervention plan. Okay, well, then one of the things that I will ask as a behavior consultant, I will ask, ‘okay, send me all the data that you have on this student and their behavior that's right now becoming a barrier in their access to their learning environment.’ And so I will look at that to see if this behavior is intense. Because not to go off the question that you're asking, but because the setting that we're in, like, for those who know about MTSS, we're essentially that tier-three building, right? So, like, it seems like they've exhausted all tier-one, tier-two support, right? And even though those things should always be given at all times, but now there's just a certain number of students who really require that intense support. And that's where that intervention comes in.

And that's where I currently feel like I'm using most of my experience, time, and knowledge as a BCBA. And if I were to get a student who has that, part of me was like, okay, when they say intense in a local, but this is a tier-three building. Is this really intense? And you have to assume, yes, this was intense for a local. But for us, if this is something that's already on their IEP, we have to take it. But sometimes we may just have to, like, ‘okay, let's see how the student does with just a change in the environment to see if these behaviors continue to happen.’ Now, if those behaviors continue to happen and we have our data now that we're also collecting, and then the locals are taking them, we can say, okay, now the student probably just needs a more intensive plan, or we really have to modify this plan now because we're seeing this. And again, it's very different.

We've also seen students who come in with a plan, and then sometimes it's like they're not even showing intense behavior, or if they are exhibiting intense behavior, it's like, what the what? Like, this is nothing really. This is, like, manageable. It's pretty redirectable. And I think if we just intensify our basic classroom management skills. I think the student might be solid or have just more visuals, like those things. 

I'm kind of laughing and smiling as I'm saying this because we've had those situations happen, but I'm just kind of speaking more like, I’m wearing the hat as a BCBA. When you're asking me about intensity and things like that, perhaps at a behavioral level, those are some ways where I can say, okay, this is where they need it, or, like, it's just a nice-to-have. And if it's more nice-to-have, what other supports are we going to be giving in place? That way, we can say they really need to have this plan. Does that make sense?

Oh, absolutely. And I think before we wrap up our conversation today, I want to give you an opportunity to also speak to, you know, we've talked about the professional judgment from our trades, our fields, our skills, how we're viewing what those needs may or may not be. But I want to make sure that you have some time to talk about that student experience. How are they showing up? What shifts are we noticing in them?

Especially, I think on your side, where it's like you already are the intensive and you're trying to decide how to back that out? And like you were just saying, maybe they just need an intensive plan; they don't actually need an intensive placement, those types of things. Can you speak a little bit to the student side? How are the students showing up in a way that is then kind of giving you and your team that ‘Okay, I think we're ready here.’

It depends, right? The students that we have, and again, I can't really like speak exactly like what a student is thinking or what they're going through. But for example, I think there's a student who we recently just had about a year and a half ago, who started with us, and he's been there, it's going to be two years soon. And we've noticed that even just with a change in placement, we saw a huge decrease in his maladaptive behaviors and those challenges.

And we think that was a positive thing. Like, I think maybe just him having the smaller classroom, more one-on-one support, just having more of that quick, fast attention from a staff member compared to a local setting where he was at. And even then, perhaps he was in a resource room, or I forget what kind of classroom he was in. But that was successful, where he seemed happier. Even parents were reporting, ‘Hey, he's coming back home with fewer injuries.’

Like, to me, I would assume that the student is content. We're not seeing these barriers, we're not seeing these behaviors happening as much as what was being reported before. And not to say I firmly believe that what's happening, but I think sometimes just with a change in setting means, as behavior analysts, when there are changes in environment, that's going to influence behavior. And so that itself was already showing us that he was being successful, and that was great.

However, we also have other situations where it's not always like that, behaviors continue to happen, but then you realize they need to be here. This is where they are able to get that support that they need. And for many different, like occupational therapy, if it's at speech therapy, it's multidisciplinary.

But I would say that's a story that comes to mind, where we do see success with students. And I think, even in our days where it is tough. We're seeing behaviors, we're seeing codes, we're seeing crisis, we know that ultimately we're doing the best that we can, and we know that they need to be there. I think we have a great team, and, of course, the goals that we always want them to go back, but I think that will be the perfect setting where they can get those intense supports and needs right now. Curriculum level, behaviorally, and all those other supports that we have. But, yeah, I think it all just depends on their progress and how they're doing, and kind of go from there.

Yeah. Well, thank you so much. I know you live this all day, every day, so I was excited to let you kind of have this conversation for our listeners. So thank you so much for sharing your expertise with us.

Thank you, Heather, so much. I appreciate it.

Empty space, drag to resize
But sometimes we may just have to, like, okay, let's see how the student does with just a change in the environment to see if these behaviors continue to happen.

Marla Watts-Pacheco

Empty space, drag to resize

In a schoolwide tiered system of support, the most intensive level of intervention—commonly known as Tier 3—is typically handled by special educators, while Tier 2 is delivered by highly trained general educators. Tier 3 focuses on highly individualized instruction, guided by a process known as data-based individualization (DBI). DBI involves starting with a validated supplemental intervention and using both diagnostic and progress monitoring data to create tailored instruction. This approach allows teachers to continually adapt the intervention based on a student's ongoing performance, ensuring the support evolves as needed.


Tier 2, on the other hand, is designed to help students who are below grade level but haven't responded well to differentiated core instruction. It uses research-based interventions to address skill gaps in small groups, usually with four to seven students. The primary goal is to reinforce foundational skills that allow students to access grade-level content, ultimately preventing further academic struggles.


Tier 3 ramps this up significantly, focusing on students with more severe and persistent learning needs who haven't made sufficient progress despite receiving Tier 1 and Tier 2 interventions. Teachers in Tier 3 use evidence-based practices proven effective across various content areas, including math, reading, writing, and behavior. The instruction is explicit, integrates cognitive strategies, offers continuous feedback, and is tightly aligned with student performance data. It’s delivered to very small groups—usually no more than three students—with similar learning or behavioral challenges.


A critical part of this intensive instruction is that it is both systematic and explicit. Teachers group students based on shared learning needs, define clear learning goals, and use carefully paced instruction to target specific skill gaps. Data is at the heart of this process, guiding the identification of these gaps and ensuring that instruction is focused on high-priority skills that are essential for academic success. Students in these settings benefit from multiple opportunities to respond, practice what they are learning, and receive immediate corrective feedback from teachers and peers.


Highly trained specialists such as reading experts, special educators, or behavioral specialists typically deliver this level of instruction. They use both quantitative and qualitative adaptations to intensify support—whether it's increasing instructional time or reducing group size, or integrating strategies that help with cognitive processes like self-regulation, memory, and academic skills. For instance, when quantitative changes aren’t enough, teachers might shift to qualitative adaptations like making instruction more explicit or incorporating cognitive supports, such as memory aids or self-regulation strategies, to further aid learning.


The DBI framework plays a pivotal role here. It helps special educators monitor the effectiveness of supplementary interventions. If progress isn’t sufficient, the first step is often to increase the instructional intensity by reducing group sizes or extending learning time. If that still doesn't yield the desired outcomes, educators turn to modifying the instructional delivery itself. This might involve using techniques like think-alouds or visual aids to model problem-solving strategies or introducing mnemonics to help students retain key concepts.


Through this flexible, data-driven approach, teachers can make continuous adjustments that meet the unique needs of each student, ensuring that even the most challenging learning barriers can be addressed with targeted, responsive interventions.


When students with disabilities aren't making adequate progress through general education instruction, special education teachers or specialists often step in to intensify the support. A widely recognized approach for doing this is through the process of Data-Based Individualization (DBI), as promoted by the National Center for Intensive Intervention (NCII). DBI provides a structured, research-based framework that helps educators make well-informed decisions to support both academic and behavioral improvements. It’s a data-driven process that revolves around the use of evidence-based curricula in the specific areas where students are struggling, combined with ongoing progress monitoring and diagnostic testing. 


One of the key aspects of DBI is that it’s not static; it encourages constant adjustment based on how well students are responding to interventions. Teachers may make adjustments in curriculum, group size, or even the structure of the instruction itself, all guided by student data. These decisions are often made collaboratively within a team setting, ensuring that multiple perspectives are considered in finding the most effective approach. 


What makes DBI particularly powerful is how it aligns so closely with several High-Leverage Practices (HLPs), particularly HLPs 1-6, which cover key aspects of collaboration, assessment, and data use, as well as instructional HLPs 11, 12, 16, and 22, which focus on adapting instruction, providing feedback, and offering explicit teaching. This alignment underscores the importance of blending evidence-based practices with data-informed adjustments to help students with disabilities thrive.


When teachers effectively promote active student engagement, particularly for students with significant learning challenges, they rely heavily on the DBI process. DBI provides a research-backed framework that allows educators to tailor interventions to individual student needs, tracking progress closely and adjusting strategies as necessary. Teachers start by selecting a secondary prevention program grounded in research, one that’s specifically designed for students who need more intensive intervention beyond what’s offered in the general curriculum.


Progress monitoring is essential throughout this process. Teachers continuously track how students are responding to instruction, using data to make informed adjustments. Diagnostic assessments play a key role as well, helping teachers create highly individualized intervention plans based on a student’s unique profile. This isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach; it’s about adapting and refining strategies until the right fit is found.


Within the DBI process, there are clear steps that guide this individualized instruction. First, teachers establish where the student is currently performing academically. From there, they set ambitious yet achievable long-term goals based on established norms. High-quality instruction or interventions are then implemented with fidelity, and teachers monitor progress toward those goals. As progress is tracked, teachers use specific decision rules to assess how effective the instruction is and how well the student is progressing.


At this point, if student progress isn’t meeting expectations, teachers generate a hypothesis about what might be hindering progress, and adjust the instruction accordingly. The beauty of this process is its flexibility; teachers can continue to monitor, assess, and make instructional changes throughout the year based on data, ensuring that the support provided is dynamic and responsive to each student’s evolving needs. This continuous cycle of evaluation and adaptation ensures that students receive the most effective, personalized support possible.


School leaders play a crucial role in ensuring that teachers are equipped to meet the diverse needs of their students, particularly through effective use of evidence-based practices and the DBI process. It’s essential that educators not only have a solid understanding of these practices but are also skilled in using data to guide their decisions. This means providing teachers with consistent opportunities for professional development and coaching, particularly around DBI. By doing so, leaders can ensure that teachers are able to implement these processes with precision and confidence, adapting instruction based on student data in real-time.


In addition to offering training, feedback is key. School leaders need to be actively engaged in observing how teachers are applying DBI across different settings, offering constructive input on whether educators are making the most accurate and efficient decisions. This helps to ensure that intensive interventions are having the intended impact.


Moreover, accountability is a significant part of this process. It’s not just about providing resources and training, but also holding teachers and other key stakeholders responsible for their roles within DBI. This includes ensuring that intensive instruction is delivered effectively, that data is being collected and monitored regularly, and that progress towards adjusted goals is being met. Leaders should also be ready to offer support or coaching whenever necessary, keeping the entire process moving smoothly and ensuring that students receive the best possible outcomes.


While many students respond well to research-based interventions like those provided in Tier 2 instruction, there are some who don’t make the expected progress, even with these targeted supports. These students require a more intensive instructional approach. This is where the framework of Data-Based Individualization (DBI) becomes critical. Grounded in over a decade of research, DBI has proven especially effective for students with disabilities who don’t show adequate progress in general education (Tier 1) or with supplemental interventions (Tier 2). 


Intensive instruction under DBI isn’t just about increasing the frequency or duration of lessons; it’s about making strategic, data-driven adjustments to the intervention itself. The beauty of DBI is its flexibility—it responds to individual student data, ensuring that instruction adapts in real time to meet their specific needs. By focusing on these nuanced, individualized aspects, students who would otherwise continue to struggle can make meaningful gains in their learning. The process is about being deeply responsive, adjusting to the unique and evolving challenges students face in their educational journey.

Empty space, drag to resize